What constitutes a piece of art? Like, most of us can agree that a painting, a sculpture, a photograph, and a piece of music are all obviously forms of art. However, I, along with others, also consider performance, video games, and food to be art. So what does it mean for something to be art? Should it meet certain objective requirements, or is it all about how the viewer perceives it? Some consider art in terms of effort, that the more skill or time that went into a painting, the more worthy of the title of "art" it is. While this is a quality present in older arts, such as the Mona Lisa or the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, it is less obviously present in more contemporary art. Sure, There are still insanely skillful pieces of art in the modern day, such as Cao Hui's recreation of Michelangelo's David, but with its stony exterior filled with uncomfortably anatomical viscera, but art on the more abstract side, like Mark Rothko's Black on Maroon sometimes gets...
There's been plenty of books that I've heard about or seen, but haven't gotten the chance to read. 1. House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski It’s been on my reading list for so long now, but I haven’t found the time to read it (or I can’t borrow it for long enough), but it is often mentioned in discussions of more non traditional horror or psych horror. I’ve listened to plenty of video essays that mention it and indie horror projects that take inspiration from it, so I want to check it out for myself. The story, to my knowledge, is that some people discover that a house is larger on the inside than it is on the outside, and chaos ensues. Mostly, it’s famous for pages like this: 2. Chemistry: A Novel by Weike Wang I heard about this book from a friend who’s in college, and I thought it would be an interesting read. It covers the stresses of working towards a doctorate, and is very honest (according to my friend). I feel like it may be helpful going into college. 3. 4321 by ...